Talk:Dungeons - Revision history

imported>An Adventurer at 23:12, 27 February 2008

2008-02-27T23:12:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 27 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			cool good idea.

			--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 17:12, 27 February 2008 (CST)
			----

	--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)		--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)

imported>Tlosk at 00:21, 24 February 2008

2008-02-24T00:21:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 23 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)		--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)

			Regarding both the table and the index, I think it's very useful to have both as it's nice to browse dungeons based on characteristics as well. But I added a link to the index at the top (since at any given time there will usually be some dungeons that have entries but haven't been added to the list here yet).

	--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.		--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.

imported>Tlosk at 00:18, 24 February 2008

2008-02-24T00:18:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:18, 23 February 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			--[[User:Tlosk\|Tlosk]] 18:18, 23 February 2008 (CST)Some of the letters have a lot fewer dungeons than other letters so I thought it might be a good idea to combine a few of the categories to get a shorter index that's easier to see all at once. (I based the number of dungeons per letter based on all available dungeons, not just the ones there's currently entries for.)

	--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.		--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.

imported>An Adventurer at 18:02, 28 November 2007

2007-11-28T18:02:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 28 November 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.		One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.

	--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 12:02, 28 November 2007 (CST) Since there was no information in the table or index yet, I removed them and added my idea. We can always go back to the table and index being seperate, but this way we can actually see what it looks like. If ~~youy~~ guys like it, we could make the same change to the NPC page.		--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 12:02, 28 November 2007 (CST) Since there was no information in the table or index yet, I removed them and added my idea. We can always go back to the table and index being seperate, but this way we can actually see what it looks like. If you guys like it, we could make the same change to the NPC page.

imported>An Adventurer at 18:02, 28 November 2007

2007-11-28T18:02:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 28 November 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.		One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.

			--[[User:An Adventurer\|An Adventurer]] 12:02, 28 November 2007 (CST) Since there was no information in the table or index yet, I removed them and added my idea. We can always go back to the table and index being seperate, but this way we can actually see what it looks like. If youy guys like it, we could make the same change to the NPC page.

imported>An Adventurer: New page: --~~~~ So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the in...

2007-11-28T17:42:49Z

New page: --~~~~ So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the in...

New page

--[[User:An Adventurer|An Adventurer]] 11:42, 28 November 2007 (CST) So, I added a dungeon index and table like on the NPC page, and again the navigation menu has been bumped down to the bottom of the page, at least for my browser. adding just the index was fine, but when I added the table thats what screwed up the nav menu.

Anyway. what does everyone think? Are both the table and the index needed?

One idea I had would be to sort of combine the two, and contain all the information on just 1 page. The Dungeon page could be divided into a subsection for each letter, with each subsection containing one of the tables. And at the top and bottom of the page we could stick a little index which redirects the person to the appropriate letter on the page.